FEVRIER 19 : Bonne nouvelle! pour les indécrottables adeptes "dinosaures" de la "STALINOSPHERE" : GROVER FURR vient tout juste de sortir un nouvel opus de ses ''évangiles Stalinophiles'' !...

.... Parce que là rèèvaluation historique  du personnage politique de Staline et du Soviétisme de cette époque n'est pas une affaire de ''nostalgie archaïque" ou de recherches historiques "anecdotiques", mais un combat sur la Vérité Historique.... Et donc sur la vérité même de la Lutte des Classes, passée présente et future!....
Parce qu'il ne faut pas laisser  la réécriture révisionniste  et incessante... de l'Histoire Vèridique aux vainqueurs {momentané$...} de la Réaction contre-révolutionnaire des tenants mortiféres du Kapitalisme parasitaire....
Parce que falsifier systématiquement la Mémoire Historique , c'est manipuler le Présent... et encager l'Avenir...

Parce que céder sur ce point POLÉMIQUE PAVLOVIEN qu'est devenu le personnage de Staline, et sa "légende noire"... c'est, par inflexions successives , intellectuelles morales et politiques, céder sur toute une suite de points essentiels, qui sont la Lecture même que l'on veut bien donner à l'Histoire Humaine en train de se faire... ''L' anthropogenèse" même de l'Etre Humain sur cette petite planête !...
Parce que les falsifications et les renoncements intellectuels-psychologiques ont des conséquences matérialistes, politiquement très concrètes.... sur le vécu même des peuples de cette planète....

Parce que derrière la discréditation-falsification du grand personnage historique de Staline, se cache DE FIL EN AIGUILLE... la stratégie réactionnaire contre-révolutionnaires de la discréditation et la NEGATION de TOUTE l'Histoire de l'Emancipation humaine Humaniste positive ''dialectique'', depuis Héraclite, Epicure ou Platon, jusqu'à la Révolution Cubaine ou Bolivaro-Chaviste....

Tres prosaïquement :
Il faut défendre la vérité HISTORIQUE de ''Staline'' ,et du ''stalinisme''...
Car la stratégie réactionnaire anticommuniste anti ''Lumieres'' est très simple: tout d'abord Staline = Hitler... c'est le début de la réécriture de l'Histoire...
Puis Staline = Lénine= Marx et Engels=Hegel =Robespierre =la Révolution française=Rousseau=Platon!.....= le Communisme=le nazisme... ''cqfd!''...😔

             

         Présentation de l'éditeur

In October 2017 Stephen Kotkin, professor of history at Princeton University, published "Stalin. Waiting for Hitler, 1929 – 1941." In it, Kotkin accuses Soviet leader Joseph Stalin of dozens of terrible crimes and atrocities.The appearance of Kotkin’s scholarship is daunting: 909 pages of text, more than 5200 footnotes, and 47 pages of bibliography in tiny, triple-column type. But Grover Furr has carefully and methodically studied every one of the hundreds of allegations of atrocity, crime, and misdeeds of any kind that Kotkin attributes to Stalin and his closest advisers. Furr has checked every reference, every article and book, that Kotkin cites as evidence. The result: Furr has found that every single "crime" Kotkin alleges is false - a fabrication. Not a single accusation holds up. On the evidence, Stalin committed NO crime, no atrocities – for if he had, Kotkin would surely have uncovered at least one. Furr’s exhaustive research shows that Soviet history of the 1930s, has been falsified. Furr’s book is a model of meticulous examination of evidence and careful, objective analysis and deduction."Stalin. Waiting For … The Truth" exposes the lies and falsehoods behind Soviet history of the 1930s with the same meticulous attention to detail as his previous works: "Khrushchev Lied" (2011), "The Murder of Sergei Kirov" (2013), "Blood Lies" (2014), "Trotsky’s ‘Amalgams’" (2015), "Yezhov vs. Stalin" (2016), "Leon Trotsky’s Collaboration with Germany and Japan" (2017), and "The Mystery of the Katyn Massacre; The Evidence, The Solution" (2018)

                     
                                   

William Podmore

5,0 sur 5 étoilesBrilliant critique of Volume 2 of Stephen Kotkin's book on Stalin

15 février 2019

In this splendid book, Professor Furr analyses the second volume in Stephen Kotkin’s biography of Stalin. Kotkin is a professor of history at Princeton University. Furr proves that “Every one of the charges of crimes or atrocities alleged by Kotkin against Stalin is false.”
Furr states that “I demonstrate this by checking the evidence Kotkin cites; by including where appropriate the evidence which Kotkin’s sources cite; and by citing other evidence that he omits.” Furr notes, “It is the professional responsibility of historians to acknowledge disputes and disagreements in the fields they research. But Kotkin never informs his readers about the scholarly disputes that exist over many of these issues …”
Jules Humbert-Droz, a Swiss Communist and friend of Nikolai Bukharin, wrote in his memoirs that in 1929, “Bukharin told me that they had decided to use individual terror in order to rid themselves of Stalin.” Furr comments, “Humbert-Droz published these memoirs in Switzerland in 1971. He was long out of the Comintern and under no pressure from the Soviets.”
Kotkin acknowledges that “Drought, in different ways, affected other world regions around this time. In the United States the ‘great southern drought’ of 1930-31, which coincided with a price collapse and banking failures, inflicted hardship across twenty-three states from West Virginia to Texas; … French West Africa suffered drought, locusts, and its worst famine ever; the French authorities did not relent on tax demands. Mortality in French West Africa was disproportionately higher (in an immensely smaller area and overall population) than in the Soviet Union.” Yet he still claims that Stalin ‘caused the famine’.
Part of the big lie about Stalin is that the Moscow Trials of opposition leaders were frame-ups. But Furr points to all the evidence that the defendants were indeed guilty of the crimes with which they were charged.
He sums up, “In July and August, 1936, confronted with accusations from their own followers, Zinoviev and Kamenev finally conceded that they had indeed helped to plan Kirov’s murder. … All the evidence now available – and there is a great deal of it – supports the hypothesis that Kirov was indeed murdered by a clandestine terrorist Zinovievist group which was allied with a similar secret terrorist group of Trotskyists, and that Zinoviev, Kamenev, and their Moscow-based group collaborated with the Leningrad-based Zinovievist group in planning the murder.”
Similarly, the evidence shows that Marshal Tukhachevsky did indeed collaborate with Nazi Germany to try to overthrow the Soviet government. Furr writes, “As of May, 2018, the transcript of the trial of Tukhachevsky et al of June 11, 1937, has finally been declassified and made available on the Internet. As of November, 2018, most of the NKVD investigation file on Tukhachevsky has been declassified as well. The testimony given there by the defendants will remove any doubt in the mind of the objective reader that these men were guilty of the crimes to which they confessed.”

                    

                  Saint Visarion est grand !

                          Et Grover est son Prophète !...

                         Allons en Paix maintenant !...

Pracho...